About Me

Name: Brian Peters
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Katrina's uncommon sense

  After a day of work as I watched NBC's Nightly News and had my supper (my wife is working....this is 2006 America, takes two to build a decent household these days) the Katrina 'Anniversary' stories were popping up.  Oh joy.  A couple of things ran across my mind as the stories went by, this is going to sound racsist, so keep this for future ammunition against me if I do anything political, but the majority of the stories concerned Blacks, African Americans.  I thought white people and oriental people were flooded out too????  As I watched the archived films of the Super Dome fiasco, the majority of people were Black.  All the shots displayed by NBC showed Black men and women shouting about where's the help, where's the food, water?   Where was Farakhan I wondered, and his NATION of Islam.  Where was Jesse Jackson and his Rainbow Coalition???  Where was the Reverand Al Sharpton and his flock??   Far away that's for sure and uncaring all of them.  For if they lived up to the rheteric they say, an army of Black Americans would've swarmed upon the New Orleans area and taken those people out.  Fact is, FACT IS....they did not come for their 'brothers and sisters'.   The Blacks in New Orleans at the Super Dome and still in there now flooded homes, waited for the Federal Government to arrive and take them out.  Now a year later, it's estimated a total of 220,000 people are living elsewhere, mostly in Houston, Texas (and I"ve heard the stories of Black on Black violence there has grown threefold). 
    Why didn't all those Black people in New Orleans leave before Katrina hit???  And why did they keep crying out for assistance afterwards and to this day??  Because unlike that Professor Dystrum (sp?) I saw interviewed, since the Civil War ended, the majority of Black America has grown accustomed to hand outs by the Federal Government and it's become an increasing generational  process of implied Federal Assistance based soley on race.  Thus, generations of Black Americans have grown accustomed to receiving money, housing, for the single item of skin color and ancestorial heritage and that psycology has made them victims to themselves.
    I thought of the rebuilding process, how could these people of very limited financial means even dream of having the 'American Dream' of owning their own home??  If they build a house, how can they finance it since most banks demand 'INSURANCE' in case of flood, etc.  Insurance, what about 'mold protection', termites.  The list is endless of what can crush a person's dream due to the growing hold of Corporate Law over this Nation of once free people.  Democracy, it's being said, is under attack by radical Islam, which it is, but also by Corporate greed unchecked by those voted to serve this Nation's people as their duly elected Representatives.  Unchecked by those who wear the black cloak on our Nations Judicial benches.  Unchecked by anyone makes a swearing oath to protect and serve the people of the United States.  For anyone should be allowed to build a home, with common sense building codes of course, but the means to which a build a home should not be predicated by private business companies under the guise of 'insurance'.  This translates into our health system as well. 
  I was listening to today's local radio talk show, and this woman called in and talked about Vanishing Absolutes concerning today's leadership and culture.  More tomorrow on this dear reader, my short time is about up, I have a working man's life and a family to take care of. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Great Explaination of ILAL's.

The following editorial letter by a yet unknown woman, explains the Illegal Alien problem in layman terms.  I received this via email and did a copy n' paste. 

 

Subject: A Well Written Letter

A well written letter

A lady wrote the best letter in the Editorials in ages!! It explains things better than all the balderdash you hear on TV.  "Recently large demonstrations have taken place across the country protesting the fact that Congress is finally addressing the issue of illegal immigration. Certain people are angry that the US might protect its own borders, might make it harder to sneak into this country and, once here, to stay indefinitely. Let me see if I correctly understand the thinking behind these protests. Let's say I break into your house. Let's say that when you discover me in your house, you insist that I leave. But I say, "I've made all the beds and washed the dishes and did the laundry and swept the floors; I've done all the things you don't like to do. I'm hardworking and honest (except for when I broke into your house)."

According to the protesters, not only must you let me stay, you must add me to your family's insurance plan and provide other benefits to me and to my family (my husband will do your yard work because he too is hardworking and honest, (except for that breaking in part).

If you try to call the police or force me out, I will call my friends who will picket your house carrying signs that proclaim my right to be there. It's only fair, after all, because you have a nicer house than I do, and I'm just trying to better myself. I'm hardworking and honest, except for well, you know.

And what a deal it is for me! I live in your house, contributing only a fraction of the cost of my keep, and there is nothing you can do about it without being accused of selfishness, prejudice and being an anti-housebreaker. Oh yeah, and I want you to learn my language so you can communicate with me.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Meth and A Chocolate City

  More reality slipped out today from Mayor Nagin and those who support him.  The reality that rascism is alive and well in the U.S., not only from whites, but from blacks and hispanics as well as 'leaders' of each ethnic group, opens mouth, inserts feet.  Dear reader, I spent much time spouting off a theory in a Military.com Future Wars thread, Who will eventually defeat the U.S. it's called.  Might want to read that.  I forsee a Balkanization of the U.S. the most predictable outcome of what may come to be the end of the U.S.A.  I saw a report today that Mexican drug dealers are now supplying 75% of the 'Meth' to dope heads and addicts in the U.S.  All due to a failure of our Government to take the border seriously.   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bad moon rising

     Just perusing through the internet news sites, it's fairly obvious to the blind man to see that Iran is playing a major rope-a-dope with the World, and Russia and China being Iran's corner coach and fight doctor.  Iran has NO intentions of giving up any of it's nuclear programs.  Iran has NO intentions of being an amicable, sensible, law abiding, integrity driven government in dealing with the 'West' with it's nuclear program.  Iran does have the intention of producing a nucelar bomb(s) and dropping one on Tel Aviv as long as the government of the radical mullahs and Ahmadinejad are in power.  If Iran's government was sincere and had integrity, Iran's government would have let the U.N. inspectors in, would have stopped it's program and would have worked WITH the West.  But....IT (Iran's Government) HAS NOT.  I could spend more time linking web site articles to prove this fact, but dear reader, I have to get up for work tomorrow and it's been a long day for me already..sorry, you're going to have to do some leg work yourself, and I will say that with a hundred percent degree of certainty, you will find what I have said here to be true.  As for Russia and China, their governments as well, they too have no desire for true World Peace, but for a hegemony of their own over the World.  Otherwise, they would back the 'West' in it's bid to ensure Iran would become 'nuke-less'.  But what goes around, comes around and radical Islam stemming from Iran will some day, nuke both the infedel cities of Moscow and Beijing - with their own weapons!  What poetic justice that will be for all of us dead Americans.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Americana Hate build a Pence

    I didn't bother reading the whole leading article about why does some much of the World hate America.  Dear reader, lean a little closer while I say this...........duh.  It's simple psycology.  The people at the top are always despised by those on the bottom, espeically if those at the top do nothing for those at the bottom.  Which is why there was a huge anti-Bill Gates/Microsoft movement, which is why so many hate Wal-Mart (I'm just mad because the local store is a disorganized pig-sty and so much stuff from Communist China is sold there).    So many people hate Paris Hilton (don't count teens - they're teens).  But simply put, it's envy (and inner greed) why the World hates America.  We have the most prosperous country in history, though current illegal immigration WILL and IS changing this country for the worse (Balkanization is coming).  I think the TV 'reality' show Survivor will give us a good glimpse into current and future America by segregating groups by race. 
   Well, Ahmadinejad, what happened to the 22nd of August and lighting up the sky or whaterver he was ranting about????  It's time to squeeze this guy, and Chavez too.
    Close to home stuff....after talking to family, friends, co-workers, and a few strangers, the U.S. hospital system is like bad tigers...they eat their young.  Doctors and nurses and adminstrators, abuse junior personnel to the point of a master/slave relationship.  Then there's the insurance scam the is absolutely corrupting our health care system from top to bottom.  Another great failure of the U.S. Political system in D.C. from 1946 - 2006 today.  Lack of real leadership, lack of real concern, lack of being Americans for America. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Winds of change

    I've avoided blogging for a few days in order to concentrate on getting a job, which I did today.  Yeah.  But it's a sign of the winds of change that are blowing.  After submitting for at least 40 different jobs, I finally landed this one, which is $7500.00 less than I was previously making in two different jobs over the past four years.  But that's the norm for this area in which I live.  A norm that has been promoted by the company CEO's and city and county commisions.  All whom travel in their own small circle of back slappers.  Do I sound discontented??  Dissolussioned is a more appropriate term.  With the 'establishment' of the local heirarchy, State and National politicians.  I watched a NBC news report last night that talked of how asbestos and decay are the norm below the Nation's Capital buildings.  So every Administration, every Congress (both Houses) for the past 30 years, have failed to ensure the few workers they relay upon, and building they work in, are in safe and good working order.  The 'me' mentality not only permeates the 'California' lifesytle of the average American, so it does our Politicians.  
    Immigration is the story of the day on talk radio and tonights talk TV shows.  My ancestors came to the United States the correct way, they came and registered at point of entry.  I can trace both my Norweigan and German heritage back to their home towns.  How many of the 11 million illegals can trace their ancestory???  How many first generation Hispanic Americans can trace their ancestors back to their home towns??  This is the difference between the Americans in today's society, those who wanted to become Americans, and those who only want to take from America.
    I listened to the President yesterday morning, he was pretty adament about his feelings over the war in Iraq.  It was stated that the Commanders on the ground would say if the war was going badly and we needed to withdrawl.  No they would not.  No military commander in the U.S. military would openly criticize the President's doctrine.  They all know what happened to George Patton and Douglas McArthur when they did.  Under Clinton's 'regime', several warrior officers were 'retired' when they spoke truth.  No, commanding flag officers will no challenge the civilian leadership over strategy even when it's going wrong.  It's yes sir/ aye aye sir, everything is fine sir.
   Which is why I WISH a new law would be passed not allowing any more major changes made to our military under every fracking Presidency that comes along.   Civilians should not be doing any operational and/or tactical decisions concerning the military.  If the military commanders feel that a place needs to be bombed regardless of what the polls and media think, then Fallujah should've been flattened.  What a boondoggle that was.
   The way things are going though, lack of any real substancial fight against the terrorist and their supporters, lack of any real substancial fight to stem the tide of illegals, lack of any real substancial fight to stem gangs, criminals, and illegal drugs,  lack of real courage and conviction by our Politicians today....the United States of America will become pages in a history book by 2040.  What will remain will not be pretty, since this country will be raped from sea to shining sea.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who's country...mine.

    The question always arises of late, who's America.  It belongs to those who abide by it's laws, customs, and history.  PERIOD.  Anyone else, needs to be either put in jail or deported.  This country will survive the way it always did before.  Americans dig deep, Americans are innovative, and Americans will work.  I was born and raised here, I am a fourth generation American, I am a military veteran, this is my America and I will not allow ILLEGALS to take my country.  Oh, if you think I'm a rascist, you better get to know the my wife first!!   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Islam and my stolen freedoms

    Over the weekend I tried to give the news a rest, not much luck since current events and history are my forte.  But while lightly watching the news, I saw the stories cropping up about what else - Islam.  Personally, I hate talking about Islam all the time, but inside, I know that Islam is becoming the greatest threat to my way of life.  I don't know about you dear reader, but for me and what I like out of life, Islam has become a threat.  There's no two ways about it.  There's no utopian dream of religions living together in peace, especially ones so diverse in their day to day beliefs.  Israel was the one place that the most extreme of religious beliefs had a chance of coexistence, but the growing fanaticism within Islam will not allow it.  The Jewish State did everything within common sense possible reason to facilitate growth and cohesion between the two religions.  Islam would not allow peace a chance.  I wish Islam was truely as religion of peace, love, and tolerance, but as the sun rises everyday, we see bombings and killings and 'attempts' that are proving a growing threat to world wide safety and peace.  Today the following article appeared on the WND website:

 

By WILLIAM J. KOLE

Associated Press Writer

VIENNA, Austria

Britain's struggle to contain Muslim extremism points up a chilling trend across Europe: the rise of radical Islam, and with it, a willingness among a small but dangerous minority of young people to answer the call to jihad. From the squalid suburbs north of Paris to the gritty streets of Sarajevo, young, disaffected Muslims are increasingly receptive to hard-liners looking to recruit foot soldiers for holy war, European counterterrorism officials and religious leaders warn.

The continent, they caution, remains vulnerable to attacks by homegrown militants despite the heightened security and attempts at inter-religious dialogue that followed the deadly 2004 train bombings in Madrid and last year's suicide attacks in London.

"Their numbers are still relatively small, but I fear they could become larger as more young Muslims embrace militancy," said Fawaz Gerges, a professor of Islamic studies at Sarah Lawrence College in New York.

Gerges calls it "the jihad generation": converts to extremism in Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Scandinavia and elsewhere who are becoming radicalized _ partly in response to the conflicts in Afghanistan and the Middle East _ and are spawning "self-generating" networks and cells.

"They're not part of al-Qaida, but in their own eyes, they are foot soldiers" who share Osama bin Laden's ideology, he said.

Little is known of what may have motivated the 23 suspects in British police custody to allegedly plot to blow up U.S.-bound jetliners with liquid explosives. But many in their middle and working class neighborhoods said the communities have become alienated by U.S. and British policy in the Middle East.

"Governments in Europe insist this is a problem of ideology, but the real cause of this phenomenon is the political crisis that is sweeping the world with the war in Iraq and the situation in Palestine," said Azzam Tamimi, director of the London-based Institute of Islamic Political Thought. Like the Sept. 11 terror attacks, the London bombings on July 7, 2005, "should have been lessons for everybody _ that government policies endanger the security of everyone," Tamimi said. "The root cause has never been addressed. Unless they open a debate, the threat will never go away."

Recruiters for hard-line Islamist groups can turn some Muslim youths with little interest in religion into extremists in a matter of weeks, contends Pierre de Bousquet de Florian, head of France's counterterrorism agency. An estimated 5,000 French Muslims embrace extremist Islam, according to a 2005 police intelligence report. France is home to about 5 million Muslims, the largest Islamic community in western Europe, and French authorities claimed to dismantle several cells earlier this year. "Young people who are indifferent to religion fall in a matter of weeks into the toughest kind of Islam and, almost without any transition, into the most worrisome kind of activism," Bousquet de Florian told the newspaper Le Parisien last month. But the rise of homegrown extremists _ many of whom operate in small, close-knit circles difficult for law enforcement to penetrate _ has complicated counterterrorism efforts in many countries. The Netherlands has been on high alert since a Dutch Muslim of Moroccan descent murdered filmmaker Theo van Gogh in 2004. Spanish authorities have been monitoring some 250 suspected Islamic radicals, and in Bosnia five men are on trial for allegedly plotting an attack on an unidentified European country _ significantly, one with troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. An open letter published this weekend by prominent British Islamic groups said the "debacle in Iraq" and the failure to quickly secure a cease-fire in southern Lebanon as Israel waged a military campaign against Hezbollah militants has made Britain a target. Britain's archbishop of York, the Most Rev. John Sentamu, said he thinks disenfranchised young Muslims turn to extremism not because of Islam but "because they are alienated, because they have been given a vision which is so imaginatively wicked."

    Europe will soon become a battle ground again, possibly within the next ten years if Iran's march to Middle East domination is not stopped.  Iran will build the next great Persian Empire since Darius III, with Amhadinejad believing he's the next Cyrus who holds the 'four rims of the earth'.   Europe has historically been a battle ground and the next war will wipe civilization from the map and only a new dark age will exist.  Europe is at a crossroads in it's history, and the E.U. had better make some sound, wise, and quick decisive decisions on it's future. 
    Back to my thoughts on the weekend, my stolen freedoms.  If I, a born, raised, retired U.S. military veteran American, board an American airliner in my town here, I can't take a plastic bottle of water that I would buy off the shelve.  Why....Islam.   Any elderly citizen with a hip replacement is automatically searched at airports, why....Islam.   The couple in Britain with an infant were going to use that infant as a ruse to get explosive chemicals on board an airliner, not only killed everyone else on that flight, but their own infant child..why....Islam.   All Americans have lost freedoms since September 11th, 2001.  Why......Islam.  
   I am unable to stick my head in the sand no more and try to rationalize that Islam is a coexistence religion of peace and that any muslim neighbor can be completely trustworthy anymore.  The World's best chance and Islam's best chance, is for all muslims to move to the Middle East and over the next hundred years, see if Islam and the World can coexist.  Until Islam can accept and let live all other religions, political beliefs, and ways of life, there will be no World Peace.
  Until the next terror strike in the U.S., this is my last posting about Islam.  I'm sick of talking about the growing facts of what is so self evident.  Dear reader, you know what needs to be done, have the courage to do it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Profiling my comment

  I sent the previous posting out to many in my email address book and I added the following:     

Hi: I've sent this to about everyone on my address book. This is something that seriously needs to be considered. This is not out of xenophobia of muslims, but of growing facts that must be faced with determination and common sense. The innocent can be duped or used, but there has to be a point where the most likely and least likely can be separated by common sense. Brian

 I mean especially in the screening at airports, do we keep pulling old ladies over, children, the pilot to the jet????  Or arab males between the ages 17 and 40 for extra special screening???  I couldn't justify in myself to continue to keep wanding a well-known retired U.S. Navy admiral while watching arab males in that target age group, walk through the screening process with only the basic everyday screening procedures being done.  Profiling is not the end all of stopping terrorist, but not using a profile is ludicrous in itself.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Profiling: Common sense

    This email I received today says it all:
 To ensure we Americans never offend anyone -- particularly fanatics intent on killing us -- law enforcement and security screeners are not allowed to "profile" people in public places or security checkpoints. However, they will continue to perform random searches of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, Secret Service agents who are members of the President's security detail, 85-year-old congressmen with metal hips and even Medal of Honor recipients. But targeting Middle Eastern male Islamists between the ages 17 and 40 constitutes "ethnic profiling."


Let's pause a moment and review....


In 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by: (a) A salesman from Utah (b) An construction worker (c) A college student on Spring Break (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1972, 11 Israeli athletes were killed at the Munich Olympics
by: (a) Your grandmother (b) A Midwest auto-parts dealer (c) A mom and her 6-year-old son visiting from Indiana (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1979, the U.S. embassy in Iran was taken over by: (a) A bluegrass band (b) Dallas Cowboy fans (c) A tour group of 80-year-old women (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

During the 1980's numerous Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon
by: (a) A family on their way to Disney World (b) Jesse Ventura
(c) A Boy Scout Troop (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by: (a) A pizza delivery boy (b) The UPS guy (c) Geraldo Rivera making up for a slow news day (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked, and a 70-year-old disabled American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard by: (a) A girls' choir (b) A hardware store owner (c) A secretary (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of
17 and 40.

In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a U.S. Navy diver was murdered by: (a) A Marine officer with two weeks leave
(b) A plumber going to visit his mom (c) A Catholic nun (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by: (a) A college-bound freshman (b) A cardiac surgeon on his way to Houston (c) A waitress (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed by: (a) A starving actress (b) A mom with a newborn (c) Twin six-year-old boys (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1995, a plot to blow up U.S.-bound international flights over the Pacific was attempted by (a) Hawaiian school kids (b) An decorated Vietnam Veteran (c) Twin sisters on their way to Paducah (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
(a) A local TV weatherman (b) A dad and his two sons on a ski trip (c) A widower going to visit his grandchildren (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2000, 17 sailors died in an attack on the USS Cole (DDG 67) in Yemen by: (a) A child in a stroller (b) A high school class on their way to visit Washington, DC (c) Newlyweds on their way to Miami (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked -- two flown into the World Trade Centers, one into the Pentagon and one into the ground in rural Pennsylvania. They were hijacked by: (a) A retired police officer on a mission trip to Haiti (b) A firefighter going to Maryland for training (c) An paramedic on his way to vacation in Hawaii (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2002 the United States liberated Afghanistan from: (a) USAID relief workers (b) Jewish Pilgrims (c) Christian missionaries (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl and other Westerners were kidnapped and beheaded by: (a) The Peace Corp (b) Scottish clansmen (c) Cuban refugees (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2002, more than 330 hostages in Beslan and 130 hostages in Moscow were murdered in sieges by: (a) Russian exchange students
(b) The Red Guard (c) Church planters (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2003 the United States liberated Iraq from "The Butcher of Baghdad," but most American military personnel were killed by:
(a) Iraqi school-girls (b) Street vegetable venders (c) Women without burkas (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2004, more than 200 Spanish civilians were murdered on trains by bombs in Madrid, detonated by: (a) Morning commuters (b) A three-year-old Chinese girl (c) Flamenco dancers (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2005 more than 50 UK citizens were killed by bombs on trains in London, detonated by: (a) Rail workers (b) Those unable to hail taxis (c) Wheelchair-bound grandmothers (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2005, there were hundreds of casualties, men, women and children, killed by bombs in Jerusalem, Riyadh and Amman. These innocent civilians were murdered by: (a) Construction workers (b) Farmers (c) Christian missionaries (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2005, the city of Paris, and other European cities experienced an extended period of riots and destruction. The unrest was led
by: (a) "Youth" (b) Soccer fans (c) Catholic nuns (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

Since the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom, more than 2,500 Americans have been murdered by terrorists. 35,000 Iraqi men, women and children have also been murdered by terrorists. Most of the combat and civilians casualties were the result of bombs detonated in civilian population centers by: (a) Fruit vendors in Baghdad (b) Disgruntled transit union workers (c) Iraqi schoolteachers (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2006, hundreds of Israeli civilians have been killed by rockets launched by: (a) the Salvation Army (b) remnants of the 'Jackson Five' (c) the cast of 'Friends' (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

In 2006, a plot to blow up 10 U.S.-bound planes from the U.K. was attempted by (a) members of the royal family (b) Japanese tourists (c) groupies of the band 'Cream' (d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

Since 2001, the FBI reports that there are major terrorist cells still in U.S. urban centers. Several of these cells have been uncovered and cell members arrested. In every case, the terrorists cell members were: (a) Southern Baptists Conventioneers (b) Lutheran Youth Groups (c) Presbyterian Elders
(d) Middle Eastern Islamist males between the ages of 17 and 40.

President George Bush said this week, "America is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation." The Council on American-Islamic Relations issued an immediate objection to the President's reference to "Islamic fascists". Nihad Awad, executive director of CAIR protested, "We have to isolate these individuals because there is nothing in the Koran or the Islamic faith that encourages people to be cruel or to be vicious or to be criminal. Muslims world wide know that for sure." In light of this objection, we are left to ponder why every Islamic leader in the U.S., and the world, does not publicly condemn every terror action being undertaken in the name of the god of Islam. Their silence is deafening...

Between 1970 and present, there were more than 60 other notable examples of terrorism perpetrated by Middle Eastern male Islamists between the ages 17 and 40, but we think you get the point. Singling out "Middle Eastern male Islamists between the ages 17 and 40" is not "ethnic profiling," it's "terrorist profiling" -- acting on prolific evidence.

Anyone for Terrorist Profiling?

Semper Vigilo, Paratus, et Fidelis! Mark Alexander Publisher, The Patriot

(Circulation of this e-mail is sponsored by The Patriot Post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stupid Americans

  Watching the news just sometimes makes me want to throw the TV out the door onto the driveway, but that would be stupid.  Almost to every talking head that appears on TV, mostly from the Left and DNC crowd, no one gets it.  This bombing attempt of the flights out of London, to the battle in Lebanon, to Iran.  It's all interconnected.  It is the predominently arab muslim war on the West.  No matter where an arab person was born, or citizenship attained, that person, mostly an arab male between 17 and 35 years of age, will become involved in some way to take down the 'Western Civilization'.  Sorry dear reader, I got off track a bit.  The bright shiny truth that most of the 'left' don't get is this:  in their argument that Iraq is deteroriating into civil war.  Duh.  It's not George Bush's fault, it's no fault of our military (remember fracken civilians rule our military, those civilians are politicians), it's no fault of the Iraqi's who are fighting and have died trying to build a democracy.  It's just plain historical fact that's causing the fighting to escalate into civil war.  What happened is pure and simple, a strong armed dictator named Saddam Hussein was able to squelch historical rivalries for the time he ruled.  Once he was gone, and the mechanism he used to keep Iraq together was gone, all those splinter groups that hid in shadows (or in Christian Europe) came out and started vying for their own power base.  Historical rivalries between the Sunni and Shia came into play again.  Clans no longer worried about Saddam's secret police, or military.  They were able now to move about and start fighting that old fight again.  This happened also in Yugoslavia when Marshall Tito died.  Tito was also a strong armed dictator that held the country of Yugoslavia together.  Now after six years of civil war there, that once country is divided up into four seperate countries now.  The same cause and effect that happened in Yugoslavia is now happening in Iraq, plain and simple.  This happens to countries, businesses, and families, how can anyone not see and understand this.  It's stupid not to understand this basic fact of life. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Changing politics and job

   Hello dear reader, sorry for the long delay in posting something totally new, awesome, and a help for your insonmia.  I've been spending most of my time job hunting.  One of those things in life that happens to most Americans.  My story, like so many others, comes from a company merger and that always means cutbacks.  About twenty five of us have been given a going-away party from our co-workers since this grand merger that our CEO announced.  We all thank you CEO for your foresight, consideration, and care of your employees, while you vacation in the Bahama's while we cut out our favorite foods.  Do I sound a bit chaffed??  Acutally, it's a good thing for me, cause I was working for the devil so to speak.  Nuff' of that.  I see that Joe Lieberman is looking for a new job as well.  That brings me to change of politics.  This event that has happened is the moving event of a larger cascading wave of change.  The DNC will fracture itself even further as it begins a fast and quick move to the socialist far left.  The time now for Conservatives is to unite under their beliefs as no other time.  With the war on Islamo-fascism becoming more and more open, it will be America's future that depends on the people voting 'liberal' or 'conservative'.  It will be these next elections in '06 and '08 that will either keep America growing, or begin the end of the great American experiment in Freedom.  V-Vendetta provided a good glimpse into our future under a socialist left government.  I just read of the meeting in Iran by CBS's Mike Wallace and Ahmadinejad and Mike does point out something of real concern:   

Of Ahmadinejad, Wallace said, "He's an impressive fellow, this guy. He really is. He's obviously smart as hell."

   Hilter was also a great talker, very impressive fellow.  Hilter was smart too in how he maneuvered his way into power and used those who trusted in him, to gain power by using them. 
   Back in the USA though, watch the DNC and those who contribute to it.  Watch the extreme left pour millions into the ad and smear campaign.  Look what happened to Lieberman's campaign webiste, hacked and crashed.  The leftist are on the move in the US to seize power by any means necessary.  We have a world war and a civil war, both undeclared, but both are going to determine the freedom of America and the rest of the World for the next one hundred years.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

UN Nuclear Ceasefire

  We've witnessed another day of bombs, both militarily and politically across the World.  The U.N. (Useless Notion) kept talking of an immediate ceasefire, talking of 'drafting' a resolution....oooh, shaking in my flipflops.   I heard it called "Kofi Annan's" United Nations (Useless Notion) and that does it fit it well, for in reality, he's the only one that still believes that the U.N. is a viable and functioning organization.  It's become nothing but a pawn to be used by nations against other nations in the political-media arena.  For the common man and woman of the World, the U.N. means nothing, does nothing, and is nothing to them.  Time for the the United States to close the Useless Notion building in New York City and do it by years end.  If the World wants to have a 'U.N.' building, I"m sure's other suitable locations, like Haiti (as mentioned by Neal Boortz a few days ago).  Haiti could use the jobs since Haiti has been a U.N. sponsored disaster, like the Congo and every other African Nation where the U.N. has been 'involved, Yugoslavia, Lebanon-Israel border, Cambodia, East Timor, etc etc etc.  No where has the 'U.N.' itself been able to stop violence, war, crime. 
    Ceasefire - n: a suspension of active hostilities.  
    Ceasefire, is only good when on field combatant commanders call it out of humanitarian reasons which has happened in history.  When diplomats 'force' a ceasefire, it only leads to more fighting and/or weapons build up by beligerrent forces/nations.  Prime Example:  North Korea.  A ceasefire was forced upon the military commanders instead of finishing the fight that should have happened.  Now, forty years later, Kim Jong Il is threatening the World with Nuclear Weapons and bringing the World closer to nuclear warfare by assisting Iran (who arms Hizbollah,Al Qaida).  If forty years ago, the diplomats had courage and conviction, they would have made Korea one nation under the U.N.  But again, a U.N. failure with horrific consequences.
   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whose fault Sen. Clinton??

    I was about to close another window in which I was verifying my facts and I seen this:

Rumsfeld's steadfast defense of the administration's Iraq policy brought on a stinging attack from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who told Rumsfeld he was presiding over a "failed policy" in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Under your leadership there have been numerous errors in judgment that have led us to where we are," the New York Democrat said. "We have a full-fledged insurgency and full-blown sectarian conflict in Iraq."

   
It was 'your husbands' fault, William Clinton, that has led us to where we are today.  If he would have done his job, if you would have been as smart as the left says you are, you both would have KNOWN to stop Al Qaeda and OBL way back in mid 1990's.   If action would have been taken back then, if our military had not been turn into a social experiment, if our Intelligence community would have been left alone to do it's job and not get over 300 personal files for you Senator.....we would not be where we are today.  Both action and in-action have results and consequences later on.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SASC lack of respect

   After watching the Senate Armed Services Committee today and two Senators in particular.....McCain and Clinton....I've lost what little respect I had for either of them.  How dare they, what gall, they have to dress down two very senior members of our Military.  If I was the President, I would have had both of them front and center of me, addressing me about my policy....in the very same manner and tone that they did today....I would dare them.  Who the hell do they think they are addressing military veterans in such a manner, demanding answers to questions that they themselves are responsible for the all the actions taken by our military.  It was their votes, their words, their authority, their use of their position of office, that made the whole chain of events happen.  They failed to take out Bin Laden when they had the chance.   McCain for being a Senator at that time, Hillary for her influence as First Lady and Wife of President Clinton. 
    While watching this SASC, both my wife and I noticed that the make up of that committee reflects the oldest and more popular politicians, something that is totally out of proportion of what good honest common sense dicates.  Why in heck, is Sen. Kennedy (who looked like he was sleeping, Sen. Clinton (who is very well known to 'loath' the military), and Sen. McCain (who's very integrity to political party and America is openly questioned by many on a local radio talk show) on such a powerful and important committee????  
    But back to the point:  who the heck do they think they are??  President Bush, please dress them down ASAP.
   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive